Cite Score:

The Effect of Volume Guarantee Ventilation on the Incidence of Retinopathy of Prematurity


Parisa Mohagheghi 1 , * , Mohammad Javad Gharib 2 , Sharin Asadi 3


1 Pediatrics Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Liggins Institute, Auckland, New Zealand

How to Cite: Mohagheghi P, Gharib M J, Asadi S. The Effect of Volume Guarantee Ventilation on the Incidence of Retinopathy of Prematurity, J Compr Ped. 2019 ; 10(2):e79523. doi: 10.5812/compreped.79523.


Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics: 10 (2); e79523
Published Online: May 22, 2019
Article Type: Research Article
Received: May 22, 2018
Revised: November 4, 2018
Accepted: May 11, 2019




Background: Newer technologies in neonatal ventilation such as combining volume guarantee with other modes of ventilation could reduce some complications of artificial ventilation by reducing the duration of ventilation and oxygen needs and fluctuations. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a multifactorial problem mainly affecting preterm infants with different risk factors. Although gestational age (GA) is the main risk factor for ROP, oxygen saturation and fluctuations, arterial pressure of carbon dioxide, and some other parameters of ventilation such as ventilation duration have great impacts on ROP incidence and severity.

Methods: One hundred and twelve infants with birthweight (BW) under 2000 g or GA under 36 weeks that needed artificial ventilation after admission to the neonatal intensive care unit were randomly assigned into two groups. In the first group, neonates underwent synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV), pressure support ventilation (PSV), or SIMV + PSV with volume guarantee (VG); and in the second group, neonates received ventilation without VG mode. All of the survived infants had ophthalmologic examination at the proper age by a retinal subspecialist to find the different stages of ROP.

Results: Mean duration of ventilation was reduced using VG mode from 74.08 ± 47.99 to 47.91 ± 30.47 hours (P < 0.05). The oxygen requirement was less in the ones underwent VG modes and the peak fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) was higher in infants receiving SIMV + PSV without VG compared to that of infants ventilated with VG mode (52.8 ± 18.4 vs. 40.3 ± 13.0, respectively). The difference between highest and lowest FiO2 was more in the group ventilated without VG (∆FiO2 = 9.52 in the group I and 18.30 in the group II, P < 0.05). Fluctuation of arterial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) was less prominent in the VG group as compared to the ones ventilated without VG and the mean difference between maximum and minimum PaCO2 was 7.16 in the group I and 13.36 in the group II (P < 0.05). Only three infants were diagnosed with ROP in the group I (with VG mode) in comparison with eight infants in the group II (odds ratio (OR) = 3.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13 - 9.36). Severe ROP needing treatment was diagnosed in one infant in the group I vs. four infants in the group II (OR = 3, 95%CI: 0.63 - 14.23).

Conclusions: ROP incidence in preterm infants could be reduced using VG mode of ventilation, since it is a safer ventilation mode in neonates due to reduction in the mean duration of ventilation, peak FiO2 requirement, and PaCO2 fluctuation.


Retinopathy of Prematurity Volume Guarantee Ventilation Pressure Support Ventilation

Copyright © 2019, Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is defined as an arrest of retinal vascular development with neuronal abnormalities in the preterm infant (1). Several risk factors are associated with its occurrence and progression that are divided into fixed and modifiable ones. Gestational age (GA), low and very low birthweight (BW), and intrauterine exposure to adverse factors are the well identified risk factors at birth (1). Although being small for gestational age is a major risk factor, some studies just proved its impact on older infants (> 29 week of GA) (2, 3).

Profound impact of controlling modifiable risk factors made them more noteworthy nowadays. Some of the most significant risk factors reported in preterm infants are the duration of mechanical ventilation and oxygen supplement, surfactant therapy (4), preeclampsia, 1-minute Apgar score, severity of respiratory distress syndrome, hypotension, septicemia, intraventricular hemorrhage, chronic lung disease (5, 6), prolonged and late postnatal steroids treatment (7), number of blood transfusions, and acidosis (8).

High oxygen saturations (SpO2) and fluctuations in oxygen concentrations due to different disease processes during the first few weeks of life may have a positive relationship with the incidence of ROP (9).

Since safe level of oxygen saturation differs with postmenstrual age and stage of ROP, no fixed SpO2 range is recommended so far (9). Lower SpO2 level in early days of life could roughly have a preventive effect on ROP; though it increased death rates in several studies (10). Although avoidance of alteration between hypoxia and hyperoxia seems to be one of the desirable methods to decrease ROP, the benefits should be balanced against the risk of mortality and other morbidities such as cerebral palsy (11, 12).

Volume guarantee (VG) is a modern mode of ventilation for neonates. It is a time-cycled and pressure-limited mode of ventilation. In this method, peak inspiratory pressure changes according to the measured expired tidal volume in each breath. Maintaining the expired tidal volume to the level set by the operator is the end result of the process (13). The benefit of using this mode of ventilation is the maintenance of a set tidal volume as a result of the combination between volume-controlled and pressure-limited ventilation (14).

The effects of VG are recently studied with various aims including duration of ventilation, total need of oxygen supplementation, weaning from the ventilation (15), and neonatal morbidities and mortality (16); the latter one was more considerable. Guven et al., demonstrated lower incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, and ROP in the subjects ventilated by VG mode compared to the ones received SIMV (10). However, to the best of authors’ knowledge, no study so far investigated the incidence of ROP after VG ventilation specifically by controlling confounding factors.

There are different guidelines for ROP screening, which are different in cutoff ranges, between 30 and 35 weeks of gestational age (GA) and 1500 to 2000 g of BW (17, 18). In Iran, it is recommended to examine all infants under 2000 g or less than 34 weeks of GA.

ROP has different stages; stages 3 and 4 need immediate management decisions, but in lower stages, close follow-up is recommended (19, 20).

2. Methods

The current study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of HRH. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Iran University of Medical Sciences. Its layout was randomized, controlled trial and the sample size was calculated 112.

Preterm infants under 2000 g or less than 36 weeks of GA admitted to NICU that needed ventilation in the first week of life were included in the present trial. The exclusion criteria were major anomalies that needed surgery, eye anomalies, and five-minute Apgar scores less than 5. Infants that died before discharge were excluded as well. After obtaining written consents from the parents, the subjects were randomly divided into two corresponding groups, each consisting of 56 infants. The subjects were allocated to the study groups by random number method. The study was performed from May 2013 to December 2015. It was a single-blind study as the nurses and physicians were informed about the ventilation mode. Neonates admitted to NICU after birth in this hospital or admitted from other hospitals in the first week of life with GA less than 36 weeks and respiratory distress were examined by the physician and included in the study if not showing the exclusion criteria. Neonates were intubated and ventilated according to the fixed protocols of NICU (i.e. showing apnea requiring mask and bag ventilation, requiring more than 50% fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure applied at 6 cmH2O, and abnormal arterial blood gas); some of them were intubated after failure of nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Surfactant administration was similar in both groups based on NICU guidelines. In group I, the ventilation mode was SIMV, pressure support ventilation (PSV), or changing between these modes according to their ventilation needs with VG. The targeted volume in VG was 4 - 6 mL/kg. The group II received SIMV, PSV, or SIMV + PSV without VG. Other therapeutic procedures in the two groups were principally similar.

Both groups were ventilated by FabianTM ventilators (Acutronic Medical Systems, Switzerland).

All infants were monitored with Spacelab patient monitors and their oxygen saturation (SaO2) was recorded every one hour and if they needed extra oxygen or resuscitation. FiO2 was recorded at the beginning of each shift and if it was changed more than 5% at the shift. Arterial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) was measured by arterial blood gases as ordered by the physician and at least once a day till they were ventilated. The required information was gathered on admission using questionnaires including several sections such as general information (gender, GA, BW, Apgar score at birth, place of birth), ventilation specifications (mode of ventilation, peak FiO2, and minimum FiO2), general outcomes (ventilation duration, maximum arterial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), minimum PaO2, maximum PaCO2, minimum PaCO2, pneumothorax, and death), and ROP (occurrence of ROP and severe ROP, which requires treatment) after ophthalmic examination in the NICU or ophthalmology clinic in HRH if they were discharged from hospital at the screening time.

To screen the neonates for ROP, indirect ophthalmoscopy was undertaken based on regular guidelines. Meeting at least one of these criteria was sufficient to be examined: GA < 36 weeks or BW < 2000 g and being ventilated mechanically. A retinal subspecialist with great experience in ROP screened the neonates during the study.

Data were analyzed with SPSS software version 23 (IBM® Corporation, USA) using chi-square test, independent samples t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and linear regression. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated if needed. P < 0.05 was considered the level of significance.

3. Results

Twenty-seven female (48.2%) and 29 male (51.8%) infants with an average (± standard deviation) GA of 31.12 ± 2.04 weeks were enrolled in the group I; four infants died before eye examination (7%). There were 30 female (53.6%) and 26 male (46.4%) subjects with an average GA of 31.14 ± 2.31 weeks in the group II (P = 0.22); three infants died in this group (5%, P = 0.8). From discharged infants, six subjects from the group I (13%) and eight from the group II (17%) did not refer for their eye examinations (P = 0.45, ns).

The average BW in the two groups was 1371.2 ± 326.2 and 1358.1261.6 g, respectively (P = 0.24).

Peak FiO2 and minimum FiO2 results are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Comparison Between FiO2 Peak and FiO2 Minimum in the Two Modes of Ventilation
Mode of VentilationNMean ± SDP Value
FiO2 peak< 0.05
SIMV, PSV4552.83 ± 18.42
SIMV + VG/PSV+ VG4640.39 ± 13.08
FiO2 minimum< 0.05
SIMV, PSV4534.53 ± 12.68
SIMV + VG/PSV+ VG4630.87 ± 8.86
∆FiO2< 0.05
SIMV, PSV4518.30
SIMV + VG/PSV+ VG469.52

Ventilation duration, maximum PaO2, minimum PaO2, maximum PaCO2, minimum PaCO2, pneumothorax, and death were compared between the two groups. VG mode of ventilation had considerable effects on the studied outcomes as shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Outcomes of the Two Ventilation Modes
Mode of VentilationNMean ± SDP Value
Ventilation duration, h< 0.05
SIMV, PSV4584.08 ± 47.99
SIMV + VG/PSV+ VG4647.91 ± 30.40
PaCO2 maximum, mmHg< 0.05
SIMV, PSV4550.96 ± 9.22
SIMV + VG/PSV+ VG4646.17 ± 6.08
PaCO2 minimum, mmHg< 0.05
SIMV, PSV4537.60 ± 3.85
SIMV + VG/PSV+ VG4639.01 ± 2.23
PaO2 maximum, mmHg< 0.05
SIMV, PSV4592.25 ± 13.39
SIMV + VG/PSV+ VG4696.25 ± 7.86
PaO2 minimum, mmHg
SIMV, PSV4564.67 ± 13.370.29
SIMV + VG/PSV+ VG4666.05 ± 14.63
O2 dependency duration, d< 0.05
SIMV, PSV457.39 ± 4.02
SIMV + VG/PSV+ VG465.19 ± 2.49

Pneumothorax, as the most important side effect of ventilation, and death, as the main indicator of outcome, were compared. The developing pneumothorax was more possible if the patient was not ventilated by controlled volumes. Nonetheless, there was no difference in the death rate among neonates ventilated differently (Table 3).

Table 3. Odds Ratio of the Two Modes of Ventilation for Pneumothorax and Death
Mode of VentilationOR

Since many studies revealed contribution of blood gas fluctuations with ROP (5, 6), in the current study, there was more oscillation of such variables among those who developed ROP eventually (Table 4). PaCO2 and PaO2 fluctuations were less prominent in the VG group as compared to the ones received ventilation without VG and it contributed to ROP incidence (Table 4).

Table 4. Blood Gas Changes in Analogous Groups of Developing ROP and Ventilation Type
Mean Difference Between Maximum and Minimum PaCO2P ValueMean Difference Between Maximum and Minimum PaO2P Value
ROP< 0.05< 0.05
SIMV + VG/PSV + VG8.36< 0.0521.580.48

The current trial mainly aimed to compare probable preventive effect of SIMV + VG/PSV + VG on ROP incidence. The two variables here were the development of ROP and rate of severe ROP, which needed further ophthalmologic treatment. Since 14 infants did not refer for eye examination (six in the group I and eight in the group II), 91 infants were examined in several sessions by the same ophthalmologist. Overall, 11 infants showed different stages of ROP (12%) and there was a significant difference between the two groups (6% in infants ventilated with VG vs. 17% in the ones ventilated without VG, P = 0.01). Odds ratio (OR) for the development of ROP in patients received SIMV + VG/PSV + VG was 3.25 (95% CI: 1.13 - 9.36) whereas it was 0.83 in the corresponding group (95% CI: 0.71 - 0.97).

Similar preventive effects were observed in higher stages of ROP, which needed treatment. The relative OR was 3.00 (95% CI: 0.63 - 14.23) for the SIMV + VG/PSV + VG group and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.84 - 1.03) for the SIMV/PSV group (Table 5).

Table 5. OR of ROP and ROP Treatment After Two Ventilation Modes
Mode of VentilationOR
ROP treatment

Therefore, it could be concluded that SIMV + VG/PSV + VG in comparison with SIMV/PSV played a preventive role in the incidence of ROP and its higher stages.

4. Discussion

Since many studies showed the effect of several fixed factors on the incidence of ROP (2, 3); the primary goal of the current study was to eliminate those factors between the two groups by randomization and show the main effect of oxygen fluctuation, high oxygen level, and PaCO2 on ROP.

Ventilating infants with less oxygen fluctuation in the delivered tidal volume could protect the immature lungs from hypo- or hyperventilation. The most significant advantage of VG is that in the face of rapidly changing lung compliance, the actual tidal volume delivered to the patient circuit remains constant. This theoretically avoids the situations of under distension and consequent alveolar hypoventilation, or over distension and lung injury. Cheema et al., reported lower peak inspiratory pressure and mean arterial pressure in the patients ventilated with VG (11). Reduced time of ventilation was concluded as an advantage of volume control (VC) versus time-cycled pressure-limited (TCPL) methods by Sinha (12), Singh (13) and Duman (14). These ventilation parameters have indirect effect on ROP.

Herein, both minimum FiO2 and peak FiO2 were lower in the VG group. Furthermore, total duration of mechanical ventilation and O2 dependency were lower in this group. A recent trial by Cheema et al., in a stratified analysis revealed that infants with GA > 25 weeks had significantly less hypocarbia when VG was used (11) and it was found that both hypo- and hypercarbia could be lessened with VG.

Although Guven et al., reported no difference in the air leak between VG and SIMV ventilation modes (10), however, pneumothorax was less frequent in VG mode of ventilation in other studies (7, 8, 21) and the impact of VG on the incidence of pneumothorax and mortality rate is still controversial. Herein, pneumothorax proved to be less likely in the VG group. A well-organized Cochrane review concluded lower mortality after receiving ventilation with VG (7), while Guven et al., found no significant decrease in death rate after volume-controlled ventilation (10). Nevertheless, no differences could be observed between the survival rates of the two groups.

The main goal of the current study was to find the impacts of ventilation type on ROP incidence and severity. Based on the current study, ROP incidence and severity were lessened by VG modes of ventilation as compared to other modes without VG. It was tried to lessen the confounding factors between the two groups. This contribution with ROP, as a well-known comorbidity of prematurity, was investigated by few studies before (7, 12). The strength of the current study was gathering sufficient sample size and dividing them into standard corresponding groups; therefore, the results were thought to be more reliable. OR of developing ROP was higher among the subjects ventilated without VG (OR = 3.25; 95%CI: 1.13 - 9.36), and those with higher stages of ROP (requiring treatment) (OR = 3; 95%CI: 0.63 - 14.23). The limitation of the study was that the invasive and non-invasive methods of ventilation were not compared, and there were 14 missing data (15%).




  • 1. Hellström A, Smith LEH, Dammann O. Retinopathy of prematurity. The Lancet. 2013;382(9902):1445-57. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60178-6.
  • 2. Hellstrom A, Engstrom E, Hard AL, Albertsson-Wikland K, Carlsson B, Niklasson A, et al. Postnatal serum insulin-like growth factor I deficiency is associated with retinopathy of prematurity and other complications of premature birth. Pediatrics. 2003;112(5):1016-20. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.5.1016. [PubMed: 14595040].
  • 3. Palmer EA, Flynn JT, Hardy RJ, Phelps DL, Phillips CL, Schaffer DB, et al. Incidence and early course of retinopathy of prematurity. The Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(11):1628-40. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(91)32074-8. [PubMed: 1800923].
  • 4. Saito Y, Omoto T, Cho Y, Hatsukawa Y, Fujimura M, Takeuchi T. The progression of retinopathy of prematurity and fluctuation in blood gas tension. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993;231(3):151-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00920938. [PubMed: 8462887].
  • 5. Castillo A, Deulofeut R, Critz A, Sola A. Prevention of retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants through changes in clinical practice and SpO(2)technology. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100(2):188-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.02001.x. [PubMed: 20825604]. [PubMed Central: PMC3040295].
  • 6. Chow LC, Wright KW, Sola A, Csmc Oxygen Administration Study Group . Can changes in clinical practice decrease the incidence of severe retinopathy of prematurity in very low birth weight infants? Pediatrics. 2003;111(2):339-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.2.339. [PubMed: 12563061].
  • 7. International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. The international classification of retinopathy of prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(7):991-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.7.991. [PubMed: 16009843].
  • 8. Holmstrom GE, Hellstrom A, Jakobsson PG, Lundgren P, Tornqvist K, Wallin A. Swedish national register for retinopathy of prematurity (SWEDROP) and the evaluation of screening in Sweden. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(11):1418-24. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2357. [PubMed: 23143441].
  • 9. McCallion N, Lau R, Morley CJ, Dargaville PA. Neonatal volume guarantee ventilation: Effects of spontaneous breathing, triggered and untriggered inflations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93(1):F36-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.126284. [PubMed: 17686798].
  • 10. Guven S, Bozdag S, Saner H, Cetinkaya M, Yazar AS, Erguven M. Early neonatal outcomes of volume guaranteed ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(4):396-401. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.733778. [PubMed: 23039373].
  • 11. Cheema IU, Sinha AK, Kempley ST, Ahluwalia JS. Impact of volume guarantee ventilation on arterial carbon dioxide tension in newborn infants: A randomised controlled trial. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83(3):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.05.013. [PubMed: 16815649].
  • 12. Sinha SK, Donn SM, Gavey J, McCarty M. Randomised trial of volume controlled versus time cycled, pressure limited ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997;77(3):F202-5. doi: 10.1136/fn.77.3.f202. [PubMed: 9462190]. [PubMed Central: PMC1720717].
  • 13. Singh J, Sinha SK, Clarke P, Byrne S, Donn SM. Mechanical ventilation of very low birth weight infants: Is volume or pressure a better target variable? J Pediatr. 2006;149(3):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.01.044. [PubMed: 16939738].
  • 14. Duman N, Tuzun F, Sutcuoglu S, Yesilirmak CD, Kumral A, Ozkan H. Impact of volume guarantee on synchronized ventilation in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(8):1358-64. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2601-5. [PubMed: 22618094].
  • 15. Wheeler K, Klingenberg C, McCallion N, Morley CJ, Davis PG, Wheeler K. Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in the neonate. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003666.pub3. [PubMed: 21069677].
  • 16. Lista G, Colnaghi M, Castoldi F, Condo V, Reali R, Compagnoni G, et al. Impact of targeted-volume ventilation on lung inflammatory response in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004;37(6):510-4. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10458. [PubMed: 15114551].
  • 17. Seiberth V, Linderkamp O. Risk factors in retinopathy of prematurity. A multivariate statistical analysis. Ophthalmologica. 2000;214(2):131-5. doi: 10.1159/000027482. [PubMed: 10720918].
  • 18. Shah VA, Yeo CL, Ling YL, Ho LY. Incidence, risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity among very low birth weight infants in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005;34(2):169-78. [PubMed: 15827664].
  • 19. Karna P, Muttineni J, Angell L, Karmaus W. Retinopathy of prematurity and risk factors: A prospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2005;5(1):18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-5-18. [PubMed: 15985170]. [PubMed Central: PMC1175091].
  • 20. Maini B, Chellani H, Arya S, Guliani BP. Retinopathy of prematurity: Risk factors and role of antenatal betamethasone in Indian preterm newborn babies. J Clin Neonatol. 2014;3(1):20-4. doi: 10.4103/2249-4847.128724. [PubMed: 24741536]. [PubMed Central: PMC3982335].
  • 21. Lin HJ, Lin CC, Tsai SW, Lin HC, Su BH. Risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity in very low birth-weight infants. J Chin Med Assoc. 2003;66(11):662-8. [PubMed: 14768853].